[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V1] xen/arm: domain_build: introduce dom0_lowmem bootargs
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:40:09PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:34:10PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > >On 14/09/16 13:18, Peng Fan wrote: > >>Hello Julien, > >> > >>On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:06:01PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>On 14/09/16 13:03, Peng Fan wrote: > >>>>Hello Julien, > >>> > >>>Hello Peng, > >>> > >>>>On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:47:10AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >>>>>Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>>On 14/09/16 08:41, Peng Fan wrote: > >>>>>>On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:23:24AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >>>>>>diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > >>>>>>index 35ab08d..cc71e6f 100644 > >>>>>>--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > >>>>>>+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > >>>>>>@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ > >>>>>> > >>>>>>static unsigned int __initdata opt_dom0_max_vcpus; > >>>>>>integer_param("dom0_max_vcpus", opt_dom0_max_vcpus); > >>>>>>+static bool_t __initdata opt_dom0_use_lowmem; > >>>>>>+boolean_param("dom0_use_lowmem", opt_dom0_use_lowmem); > >>>>>> > >>>>>>int dom0_11_mapping = 1; > >>>>>> > >>>>>>@@ -244,7 +246,7 @@ static void allocate_memory(struct domain *d, struct > >>>>>>kernel_info *kinfo) > >>>>>> unsigned int order = get_11_allocation_size(kinfo->unassigned_mem); > >>>>>> int i; > >>>>>> > >>>>>>- bool_t lowmem = is_32bit_domain(d); > >>>>>>+ bool_t lowmem = is_32bit_domain(d) || opt_dom0_use_lowmem; > >>>>>> unsigned int bits; > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Pass "dom0_use_lowmem=1" to xen to allocate lowmem as much as possible. > >>>>> > >>>>>Again, what is the benefit to have a command line option for that? > >>>> > >>>>Then you prefer directly change "bool_t lowmem = is_32bit_domain(d);" to > >>>>"bool_t lowmem = true" ? > >>>>I just want to give user a choice. > >>> > >>>We don't add new command line parameter just because they look cool to > >>>have. > >>>So far, you did not explain why it would be good to let the choice to the > >>>user and how it could be used. > >> > >>I have not try, if there is no lowmem. > >> > >>I have not look into alloc_domheap_pages. > >>I am not sure whether there is such a platform or not, > >>just thinking if there is soc that dram memory starts from 4GB, and there > >>is no dram > >>below 4GB. If we still can get memory when lowmem is true, I am ok to > >>change directly assign > >>lowmem with value true. Anyway I have not look into the internals of > >>domheap and > >>not sure whether there is such a platform that no lowmem (:- > > > >We cannot exclude this possibility. However, the only reason that Xen is > >requiring to allocate a bank below 4GB for 32-bit domain is to handle > >non-LPAE kernel. > > Now also need to handle device that have DMA limitation -:) Hi Peng, Doesn't your platform have an IOMMU/SMMU? Cheers, Edgar _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |