[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/x86: assert that local_events_need_delivery is not called by the idle domain

To: "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 04:45:57 -0600
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:46:09 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It doesn't make sense since the idle domain doesn't receive any events.

The change itself is fine, but I think it would help if the commit
message made explicit why this is becoming relevant.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/x86: assert that local_events_need_delivery is not called by the idle domain
  - From: Roger Pau Monne

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/30] PVHv2 Dom0
  - From: Roger Pau Monne
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/x86: assert that local_events_need_delivery is not called by the idle domain
  - From: Roger Pau Monne

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/30] xen/x86: allow calling {sh/hap}_set_allocation with the idle domain
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] hvmloader, pci: Don't try to relocate memory if 64-bit BAR is bigger than ~2GB
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/x86: assert that local_events_need_delivery is not called by the idle domain
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/x86: assert that local_events_need_delivery is not called by the idle domain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.