Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] docs: remove wrong statement about bug in xenstore

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 24/10/16 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 24.10.16 at 15:29, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/docs/misc/xenstore.txt
>> +++ b/docs/misc/xenstore.txt
>> @@ -229,8 +229,10 @@ TRANSACTION_START       |                       
>> <transid>|
>>      tx_id request header field.  When transaction is started whole
>>      db is copied; reads and writes happen on the copy.
>>      It is not legal to send non-0 tx_id in TRANSACTION_START.
>> -    Currently xenstored has the bug that after 2^32 transactions
>> +    Currently oxenstored has the bug that after 2^32 transactions
>>      it will allocate the transid 0 for an actual transaction.
> 
> While I know nothing about OCaml, I read Andrew's earlier reply
> to mean different behavior would result than the one described,
> namely differing between 32-bit and 64-bit builds.

Do we really still support 32 bit dom0? I thought the support has
ended some time ago?


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel