Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] docs: remove wrong statement about bug in xenstore

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 24.10.16 at 16:43, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24/10/16 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 24.10.16 at 15:29, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> --- a/docs/misc/xenstore.txt
>>> +++ b/docs/misc/xenstore.txt
>>> @@ -229,8 +229,10 @@ TRANSACTION_START      |                       
>>> <transid>|
>>>     tx_id request header field.  When transaction is started whole
>>>     db is copied; reads and writes happen on the copy.
>>>     It is not legal to send non-0 tx_id in TRANSACTION_START.
>>> -   Currently xenstored has the bug that after 2^32 transactions
>>> +   Currently oxenstored has the bug that after 2^32 transactions
>>>     it will allocate the transid 0 for an actual transaction.
>> 
>> While I know nothing about OCaml, I read Andrew's earlier reply
>> to mean different behavior would result than the one described,
>> namely differing between 32-bit and 64-bit builds.
> 
> Do we really still support 32 bit dom0? I thought the support has
> ended some time ago?

I don't recall any statement to that effect.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel