[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] x86emul: deal with ASSERT()s triggering

To: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:28:24 -0700
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:28:35 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

1: x86emul: correct VEX/XOP/EVEX operand size handling for 16-bit code
2: x86/emulate: don't assume that addr_size == 32 implies protected mode

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/emulate: don't assume that addr_size == 32 implies protected mode
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86emul: deal with ASSERT()s triggering
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm/p2m: Fix regression during domain shutdown with active mem_access
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86emul: deal with ASSERT()s triggering
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 baseline-only test] 68451: tolerable trouble: broken/fail/pass
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86emul: deal with ASSERT()s triggering
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.