[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c
Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c"): > Code movement only. No functional change intended. This statement is not true because > Juergen Gross (9): > libxl: adjust copyright comment of libxl.c ... that patch is not just code motion. Can you please double-check, and explicitly enumerate the other intentional changes ? Obviously there is an intentional change to the Makefile, and the copyright header is duplicated in each case. Are there any other changes which are not precisely moving a block of lines from libxl.c into other file(s), completely unchanged ? Did you have to make any functions non-static ? Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |