[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c
On 08/02/17 15:33, Ian Jackson wrote: > Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c"): >> Code movement only. No functional change intended. > > This statement is not true because > >> Juergen Gross (9): >> libxl: adjust copyright comment of libxl.c > > ... that patch is not just code motion. Okay, more precise wording: Changes are: - moving functions into new or existing sources - modification of Copyright comment - made two functions non-static: libxl__get_memory_target(), xcinfo2xlinfo() - made one function static: libxl__device_frontend_path() - modified Makefile to include new source files - removed some trailing spaces in moved code - reordered some functions in new sources to get rid of some local prototypes > Can you please double-check, and explicitly enumerate the other > intentional changes ? Obviously there is an intentional change to the > Makefile, and the copyright header is duplicated in each case. > > Are there any other changes which are not precisely moving a block of > lines from libxl.c into other file(s), completely unchanged ? > > Did you have to make any functions non-static ? Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |