[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Unshared IOMMU issues
Hi Jan, On 16/02/17 15:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.02.17 at 16:02, <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:On 15.02.17 at 18:43, <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:1. I need: Allow P2M core on ARM to update IOMMU mapping from the first "p2m_set_entry". I do: I explicitly set need_iommu flag for *every* guest domain during iommu_domain_init() on ARM in case if page table is not shared. At that moment I have no knowledge about will any device be assigned to this domain or not. I am just want to receive all mapping updates from P2M code. The P2M will update IOMMU mapping only when need_iommu is set and page table is not shared. I have doubts: Is it correct to just force need_iommu flag?No, I don't think so. This is a waste of a measurable amount of resources when page tables aren't shared.Or maybe another flag should be introduced?Not sure what you think of here. Where's the problem with building IOMMU page tables at the time the first device gets assigned, just like x86 does?OK, I have already had a look at arch_iommu_populate_page_table() for x86. I don't know at the moment how this solution can help me. There are a least two points the prevent me from doing the similar thing. 1. For create IOMMU mapping I need both mfn and gfn. (+ flags). I am able to get mfn only. How can I find corresponding gfn?As the x86 one shows, via mfn_to_gmfn(). If ARM doesn't have this, perhaps it needs to gain it?
Looking at the x86 implementation, mfn_to_gmfn is using a table for that indexed by the MFN. This is requiring virtual address space that is already scarce on ARM32 and also using physical memory.
I am not convinced this is the right things to do on ARM as the only user so far will be the IOMMU code.
Another solution would be to go through the stage-2 page table and replicate all the mappings.
2. The d->page_list seems only contains domain RAM (not 100% sure). Where can I get other regions (mmios, etc)?These necessarily are being tracked for the domain, so you need to take them from wherever they're stored on ARM.
Is there any reason why you don't seem to have such code on x86? AFAICT only RAM is currently mapped.
Regarding ARM, we know whether a domain is allowed to access a certain range of MMIO, but, similarly to above, we don't have the conversion MFN -> GFN for them. However in this case, we would not be able to use an M2P as a same MFN may be mapped in multiple domain.
Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our