[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: correct {,v}{ld,st}mxcsr handling



Calls to get_fpu() were missing. Calls to put_fpu() are deliberately
not being added: Neither instruction can raise #XM, so the catch-all
_put_fpu() is just fine here.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -6509,6 +6509,7 @@ x86_emulate(
             vcpu_must_have(sse);
         ldmxcsr:
             generate_exception_if(src.type != OP_MEM, EXC_UD);
+            get_fpu(vex.opcx ? X86EMUL_FPU_ymm : X86EMUL_FPU_xmm, &fic);
             generate_exception_if(src.val & ~mxcsr_mask, EXC_GP, 0);
             asm volatile ( "ldmxcsr %0" :: "m" (src.val) );
             break;
@@ -6518,6 +6519,7 @@ x86_emulate(
             vcpu_must_have(sse);
         stmxcsr:
             generate_exception_if(dst.type != OP_MEM, EXC_UD);
+            get_fpu(vex.opcx ? X86EMUL_FPU_ymm : X86EMUL_FPU_xmm, &fic);
             asm volatile ( "stmxcsr %0" : "=m" (dst.val) );
             break;
 



Attachment: x86emul-MXCSR-fix.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.