[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RTDS Patch v3 for Xen4.8]
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 11:17 -0500, Haoran Li wrote: > From: naroahlee <naroahlee@xxxxxxxxx> > > When more than one idle VCPUs that have > the same PCPU as their previous running core invoke runq_tickle(), > they will > tickle the same PCPU. The tickled PCPU will only pick at most one > VCPU, i.e., > the highest-priority one, to execute. The other VCPUs will not be > scheduled > for a period, even when there is an idle core, making these VCPUs > unnecessarily starve for one period. Therefore, always make sure > that we only > tickle PCPUs that have not been tickled already. > > Signed-off-by: Haoran Li <naroahlee@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Meng Xu <mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > So, from what I can see from the 'From' tag, and from the pieces of emails, that appear below the patch, this is some kind of resubmission/new version, of a patch sent a while back. However, the subject seems to have changed... Or in any case, the current subject is no good. It's also a bit unusual, and definitely not comfortable for people managing the patch, to have a quoted email conversation below the patch itself (or so I think). So, please, remove it. Finally, in that quoted email conversation, I asked for some changes, and said that, with them done, my Reviewed-by: would stand. Have you made those changes? If yes, please, mention this somewhere (Ideally, between the S-o-b, R-b tags and the patch itself, after a '---' mark). Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |