[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/balloon: don't online new memory initially
On 03/07/17 20:44, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > On 03/07/17 16:40, Juergen Gross wrote: >> When setting up the Xenstore watch for the memory target size the new >> watch will fire at once. Don't try to reach the configured target size >> by onlining new memory in this case, as the current memory size will >> be smaller in almost all cases due to e.g. BIOS reserved pages. >> >> Onlining new memory will lead to more problems e.g. undesired conflicts >> with NVMe devices meant to be operated as block devices. >> >> Instead remember the difference between target size and current size >> when the watch fires for the first time and apply it to any further >> size changes, too. >> >> In order to avoid races between balloon.c and xen-balloon.c init calls >> do the xen-balloon.c initialization from balloon.c. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/xen/balloon.c | 3 +++ >> drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- >> include/xen/balloon.h | 8 ++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/xen/balloon.c b/drivers/xen/balloon.c >> index 50dcb68d8070..ab609255a0f3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/xen/balloon.c >> +++ b/drivers/xen/balloon.c >> @@ -780,6 +780,9 @@ static int __init balloon_init(void) >> } >> #endif >> >> + /* Init the xen-balloon driver. */ >> + xen_balloon_init(); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> subsys_initcall(balloon_init); >> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c b/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c >> index e7715cb62eef..66ec519c825c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c >> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c >> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ static void watch_target(struct xenbus_watch *watch, >> { >> unsigned long long new_target; >> int err; >> + static bool watch_fired; >> + static unsigned long target_diff; >> >> err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, "memory", "target", "%llu", &new_target); >> if (err != 1) { >> @@ -69,7 +71,14 @@ static void watch_target(struct xenbus_watch *watch, >> /* The given memory/target value is in KiB, so it needs converting to >> * pages. PAGE_SHIFT converts bytes to pages, hence PAGE_SHIFT - 10. >> */ >> - balloon_set_new_target(new_target >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10)); >> + new_target >>= PAGE_SHIFT - 10; >> + if (watch_fired) { >> + balloon_set_new_target(new_target - target_diff); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + watch_fired = true; >> + target_diff = new_target - balloon_stats.target_pages; >> } >> static struct xenbus_watch target_watch = { >> .node = "memory/target", >> @@ -94,13 +103,8 @@ static struct notifier_block xenstore_notifier = { >> .notifier_call = balloon_init_watcher, >> }; >> >> -static int __init balloon_init(void) >> +void __init xen_balloon_init(void) >> { >> - if (!xen_domain()) >> - return -ENODEV; >> - >> - pr_info("Initialising balloon driver\n"); >> - >> register_balloon(&balloon_dev); >> >> register_xen_selfballooning(&balloon_dev); >> @@ -109,7 +113,7 @@ static int __init balloon_init(void) >> >> return 0; >> } >> -subsys_initcall(balloon_init); >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_balloon_init); >> >> #define BALLOON_SHOW(name, format, args...) \ >> static ssize_t show_##name(struct device *dev, \ >> diff --git a/include/xen/balloon.h b/include/xen/balloon.h >> index d1767dfb0d95..8906361bb50c 100644 >> --- a/include/xen/balloon.h >> +++ b/include/xen/balloon.h >> @@ -35,3 +35,11 @@ static inline int register_xen_selfballooning(struct >> device *dev) >> return -ENOSYS; >> } >> #endif >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON >> +void xen_balloon_init(void); >> +#else >> +static inline void xen_balloon_init(void) >> +{ >> +} >> +#endif >> > > We came across the same issue just recently. The problem was that for > some kernel versions DMA buffers for emulated devices are allocated in > this recently hotplugged area. This area is not properly described for > QEMU so when a DMA request comes in QEMU treats it as "unassigned" and > skips by default. This eventually leads to cryptic failures of system > loading. > > Internally we developed a workaround for QEMU with which we try to > satisfy all the "unassigned" requests. But it doesn't solves the problem > in a proper way IMHO. > > I haven't not completely understood your use-case but we might try come > up with a general solution for both of the problems because they are > obviously related. > >> Onlining new memory will lead to more problems e.g. undesired conflicts >> with NVMe devices meant to be operated as block devices. > > Could you explain this in more detail? Please see https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-03/msg03020.html for a more detailed discussion. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |