[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 23/24] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig
- To: vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:25:22 +0100
- Cc: kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:25:37 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Hi,
On 18/07/17 12:41, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
CONFIG_NUMA is defined in xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig.
Move to common/Kconfig and enabled by default.
Also, NUMA feature uses PDX for physical address to
memory node mapping. Hence make HAS_PDX dependent
for NUMA.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/common/Kconfig | 4 ++++
xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 ---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/Kconfig b/xen/common/Kconfig
index dc8e876..6e421c7 100644
--- a/xen/common/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/common/Kconfig
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ config HAS_GDBSX
config HAS_IOPORTS
bool
+config NUMA
+ def_bool y
+ depends on HAS_PDX
On previous version, Jan asked to remove the dependency on PDX. You said
you will do it... So why it is not done?
+
config HAS_BUILD_ID
string
option env="XEN_HAS_BUILD_ID"
diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index b64d373..488372f 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,3 @@ config ACPI
config ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP
bool
-
-config NUMA
- bool
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
