Re: [Xen-devel] Regression PCI passthrough from 4.5.5 to 4.6.0-rc1

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.08.17 at 16:49, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another option is to (ab)use the msi.gflags field to add another flag
> in order to signal Xen whether the interrupt should be unmasked. This
> is in line with what you suggest below.

From a brief look it looks like this would be doable, but the way these
flags are being communicated is rather ugly (the values used here
aren't part of the public interface, and hence it wasn't immediately
clear whether using one of the unused bits would be an option, but
it looks like it is).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel