[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2 2/7] arm64: Add definitions for fwnode_handle
On 10/12/2017 6:45 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/09/17 01:37, Sameer Goel wrote: >> This will be used as a device property to match the DMA capable devices >> with the associated SMMU. The header file is a port from linux. The code >> was changed to remove the types that were not needed for Xen. > > I think you probably want a bit more context in the commit message about > implement fwnode.h in common code. > > Within this series, fwnode seems to only be used by Arm. So what would be the > advantage to get that in xen/? Is it going to be used by x86 or taken > advantage in common code? > >> >> Linux ChangeId:ce793486e23e: driver core / ACPI: Represent ACPI >> companions using fwnode_handle >> >> Signed-off-by: Sameer Goel <sgoel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/include/asm-arm/device.h | 2 ++ >> xen/include/xen/fwnode.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 xen/include/xen/fwnode.h >> >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/device.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/device.h >> index 6734ae8..78c38fe 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/device.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/device.h >> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ >> #define __ASM_ARM_DEVICE_H >> #include <xen/init.h> >> +#include <xen/fwnode.h> >> enum device_type >> { >> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ struct device >> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE >> struct dt_device_node *of_node; /* Used by drivers imported from Linux >> */ > > I was expecting a todo in the code after the discussion about leave of_node > here. > >> #endif >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; /*fw device node identifier */ The fwnode handle was provide a match cookie for the SMMUs and not much else. Even with this around we will need the dt info in the device node. I agree that this rolls up into fw spec and I can look at the code cleanup for the next patch. > > Space missing before "fw". > >> struct dev_archdata archdata; >> }; >> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/fwnode.h b/xen/include/xen/fwnode.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..0fed958 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/xen/include/xen/fwnode.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ >> +/* >> + * fwnode.h - Firmware device node object handle type definition. >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2015, Intel Corporation >> + * Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + * >> + * Ported from Linux include/linux/fwnode.h >> + * => commit ce793486e23e0162a732c605189c8028e0910e86 >> + * >> + * No functional Xen modifications. >> + */ >> + >> +#ifndef __XEN_FWNODE_H_ >> +#define __XEN_FWNODE_H_ >> + >> +enum fwnode_type { >> + FWNODE_INVALID = 0, >> + FWNODE_OF, >> + FWNODE_ACPI, >> + FWNODE_ACPI_STATIC, >> + FWNODE_IRQCHIP >> +}; >> + > > Looking at Linux code, the fwnode_type already disappeared from Linux (see > commit db3e50f3234b "device property: Get rid of struct fwnode_handle type > field"). > > I understand the goal on using fwnode is to help porting drivers from Linux. > So how much this has changed now? This was not very useful in any case. So, I will move over to the new version. > > Cheers, > >> +struct fwnode_handle { >> + enum fwnode_type type; >> + struct fwnode_handle *secondary; >> +}; >> + >> +#endif >> > -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |