[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 10/16] ts-debian-fixup: remove extra= before appending our own
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 10/16] ts-debian-fixup: remove extra= before appending our own"): > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:03:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Wei Liu writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH 10/16] ts-debian-fixup: remove extra= > > before appending our own"): > > > The original extra= was not removed, so there were two extra= in the > > > resulting config file. > > > > What is the original extra= ? Why should we not combine them ? > > The original extra= is generated by xen-create-image. It has the content > "elevator=noop". It doesn't seem too useful to me. But I'm fine with > combination them. I think they should be combined. And that "elevator=noop" doesn't sound unreasonable. > > > It wasn't a problem for xl because the second extra= took precedence. > > > However libvirt tests would only pick up the first extra= -- they > > > worked by chance. > > > > That's odd. Is this to do with the xl -> libxl config converter ? > > It seems to me that that converter should interpret xl config files > > the same way xl does. (Also xm did the same: last setting wins.) > > Yes, the converter only picks up the first. This is a bug, then. Where should we file it ? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |