Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 02/13] xen/pvcalls: implement frontend disconnect

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/24/2017 01:33 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> +static void pvcalls_front_free_map(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata,
> +                                struct sock_mapping *map, bool locked)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = {
>       { "pvcalls" },
>       { "" }
> @@ -27,6 +66,32 @@
>  
>  static int pvcalls_front_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>  {
> +     struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> +     struct sock_mapping *map = NULL, *n;

Your last comment made me look again at sock_mapping definition. And
then I noticed that it is not defined until patch 4 ;-(

-boris

> +
> +     bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
> +     dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL);
> +     pvcalls_front_dev = NULL;
> +     if (bedata->irq >= 0)
> +             unbind_from_irqhandler(bedata->irq, dev);
> +
> +     smp_mb();
> +     while (atomic_read(&pvcalls_refcount) > 0)
> +             cpu_relax();
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(map, n, &bedata->socket_mappings, list) {
> +             if (map->active_socket) {
> +                     /* No need to lock, refcount is 0 */
> +                     pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map, true);
> +             } else {
> +                     list_del(&map->list);
> +                     kfree(map);
> +             }
> +     }
> +     if (bedata->ref >= 0)
> +             gnttab_end_foreign_access(bedata->ref, 0, 0);
> +     kfree(bedata->ring.sring);
> +     kfree(bedata);
> +     xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
>       return 0;
>  }
>  


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel