[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 02/13] xen/pvcalls: implement frontend disconnect
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 10/24/2017 01:33 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > +static void pvcalls_front_free_map(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata, > > + struct sock_mapping *map, bool locked) > > +{ > > +} > > + > > static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = { > > { "pvcalls" }, > > { "" } > > @@ -27,6 +66,32 @@ > > > > static int pvcalls_front_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev) > > { > > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata; > > + struct sock_mapping *map = NULL, *n; > > Your last comment made me look again at sock_mapping definition. And > then I noticed that it is not defined until patch 4 ;-( I moved the definition of struct sock_mapping to this patch. Then, I tested the build patch by patch. I also had to move a few #includes from patch #5 to #4, but everything builds fine now. > > + > > + bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev); > > + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL); > > + pvcalls_front_dev = NULL; > > + if (bedata->irq >= 0) > > + unbind_from_irqhandler(bedata->irq, dev); > > + > > + smp_mb(); > > + while (atomic_read(&pvcalls_refcount) > 0) > > + cpu_relax(); > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(map, n, &bedata->socket_mappings, list) { > > + if (map->active_socket) { > > + /* No need to lock, refcount is 0 */ > > + pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map, true); > > + } else { > > + list_del(&map->list); > > + kfree(map); > > + } > > + } > > + if (bedata->ref >= 0) > > + gnttab_end_foreign_access(bedata->ref, 0, 0); > > + kfree(bedata->ring.sring); > > + kfree(bedata); > > + xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed); > > return 0; > > } > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |