[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 5/7] libxl: support unmapping static shared memory areas during domain destruction
Hi Julien, 2018-02-12 23:09 GMT+08:00 Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > On 12/02/18 14:52, Zhongze Liu wrote: >> >> 2018-02-08 0:54 GMT+08:00 Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>: >>> >>> On 07/02/18 16:27, Zhongze Liu wrote: >> >> It seems that I mistakenly use transaction as a global lock. Now I don't >> have >> any reasons not putting the unmap out of the transaction, but this will >> break >> the original transaction into two, and I do think that we need some >> explicit >> locking here. > > > Can you explain why you need specific locking here? What are you trying to > protect? Are you trying to protect against two process doing the unmap? > Yes. Cheers, Zhongze Liu _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |