[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] x86: fix indirect thunk usage of CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:53:08AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 20.02.18 at 13:42, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:32:17AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 20.02.18 at 12:22, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:13:42AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >> >>> On 20.02.18 at 12:01, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/asm_defns.h > >> >> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/asm_defns.h > >> >> > @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ > >> >> > #include <asm/alternative.h> > >> >> > > >> >> > #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__ > >> >> > +#ifndef CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK > >> >> > +.equ CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK, 0 > >> >> > +#endif > >> >> > # include <asm/indirect_thunk_asm.h> > >> >> > #else > >> >> > asm ( "\t.equ CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK, " > >> >> > > >> >> > It's fairly similar to my first approach, but at least "#ifdef > >> >> > CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK" will still work as expected after this fix. > >> >> > >> >> I've used something similar in backports to old versions, so I > >> >> wonder whether what you quote above is right: Assembly files > >> >> don't get handed to clang anyway iirc, so the change would > >> >> seem to be needed in the #else part of the conditional. > >> > > >> > Assembly files do get handed to clang, from xen/Rules.mk: > >> > > >> > %.o: %.S Makefile > >> > $(CC) $(AFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ > >> > > >> > Xen doesn't call as directly to compile those, or am I missing > >> > something? > >> > >> Oh, I was referring to the -mno-integrated-as (or whatever it's > >> called) option. "Handed to clang" wasn't the best way to put it, > >> I agree. But it's clang's integrated assembler which the problem > >> is with. > > > > Oh, I see. You are right, this is just a preparatory change for patch > > 4, which does enable clang's integrated assembler if the right > > features are present. > > > > Let me know if you think the above chunk is acceptable. > > It is certainly acceptable if it helps; you now apparently agreeing > I'm more confused though by this question. Iirc you don't enable > the integrated assembler for assembly sources, but only for C ones. So at this point the integrated assembler is only enabled for C sources. In patch 4 I enable the integrated assembler for everything if possible, but in order to enable it I need to solve this issue first. I can merge patches 3 and 4 if it's going to be clearer. Hope this help shed some light. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |