[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 9/9] drm/xen-front: Implement communication with backend
- To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, airlied@xxxxxxxx, daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx, seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:45:24 +0200
- Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 09:45:42 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 03/06/2018 11:26 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 03/05/2018 11:25 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:03:42AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
Handle communication with the backend:
- send requests and wait for the responses according
to the displif protocol
- serialize access to the communication channel
- time-out used for backend communication is set to 3000 ms
- manage display buffers shared with the backend
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
After the demidlayering it probably makes sense to merge this with the
overall kms/basic-drm-driver patch. Up to you really.
The reason for such partitioning here and before was that
I can have Xen/DRM parts separate, so those are easier for
review by Xen/DRM communities. So, I would prefer to have it
as it is
Well for reviewing the kms parts I need to check what the xen parts are
doing (at least sometimes), since semantics of what you're doing matter,
and there's a few cases which new drivers tend to get wrong. So for me,
this splitting makes stuff actually harder to review.
And I guess for the xen folks it won't hurt if they see a bit clearer how
it's used on the drm side (even if they might not really understand what's
going on). If we have some superficial abstraction in between each of the
subsystem maintainers might make assumptions about what the other side of
the code is doing which turn out to be wrong, and that's not good.
Just explaining my motivation for why I don't like abstractions and
splitting stuff up into patches that don't make much sense on their own
(because the code is just hanging out there without being wired up
anywhere).
Ok, no problem here. Will squash relevant patches then
-Daniel
-Daniel
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c | 327
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 327 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c
index 8de88e359d5e..5ad546231d30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c
@@ -31,12 +31,146 @@
#include "xen_drm_front_evtchnl.h"
#include "xen_drm_front_shbuf.h"
+/* timeout in ms to wait for backend to respond */
+#define VDRM_WAIT_BACK_MS 3000
+
+struct xen_drm_front_dbuf {
+ struct list_head list;
+ uint64_t dbuf_cookie;
+ uint64_t fb_cookie;
+ struct xen_drm_front_shbuf *shbuf;
+};
+
+static int dbuf_add_to_list(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
+ struct xen_drm_front_shbuf *shbuf, uint64_t dbuf_cookie)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *dbuf;
+
+ dbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*dbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dbuf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ dbuf->dbuf_cookie = dbuf_cookie;
+ dbuf->shbuf = shbuf;
+ list_add(&dbuf->list, &front_info->dbuf_list);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *dbuf_get(struct list_head *dbuf_list,
+ uint64_t dbuf_cookie)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *buf, *q;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, q, dbuf_list, list)
+ if (buf->dbuf_cookie == dbuf_cookie)
+ return buf;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void dbuf_flush_fb(struct list_head *dbuf_list, uint64_t fb_cookie)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *buf, *q;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, q, dbuf_list, list)
+ if (buf->fb_cookie == fb_cookie)
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_flush(buf->shbuf);
+}
+
+static void dbuf_free(struct list_head *dbuf_list, uint64_t dbuf_cookie)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *buf, *q;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, q, dbuf_list, list)
+ if (buf->dbuf_cookie == dbuf_cookie) {
+ list_del(&buf->list);
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_unmap(buf->shbuf);
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_free(buf->shbuf);
+ kfree(buf);
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+static void dbuf_free_all(struct list_head *dbuf_list)
+{
+ struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *buf, *q;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, q, dbuf_list, list) {
+ list_del(&buf->list);
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_unmap(buf->shbuf);
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_free(buf->shbuf);
+ kfree(buf);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct xendispl_req *be_prepare_req(
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl, uint8_t operation)
+{
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+
+ req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&evtchnl->u.req.ring,
+ evtchnl->u.req.ring.req_prod_pvt);
+ req->operation = operation;
+ req->id = evtchnl->evt_next_id++;
+ evtchnl->evt_id = req->id;
+ return req;
+}
+
+static int be_stream_do_io(struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl,
+ struct xendispl_req *req)
+{
+ reinit_completion(&evtchnl->u.req.completion);
+ if (unlikely(evtchnl->state != EVTCHNL_STATE_CONNECTED))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ xen_drm_front_evtchnl_flush(evtchnl);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int be_stream_wait_io(struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl)
+{
+ if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&evtchnl->u.req.completion,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(VDRM_WAIT_BACK_MS)) <= 0)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+ return evtchnl->u.req.resp_status;
+}
+
static int be_mode_set(struct xen_drm_front_drm_pipeline *pipeline, uint32_t
x,
uint32_t y, uint32_t width, uint32_t height, uint32_t bpp,
uint64_t fb_cookie)
{
- return 0;
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl;
+ struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info;
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ front_info = pipeline->drm_info->front_info;
+ evtchnl = &front_info->evt_pairs[pipeline->index].req;
+ if (unlikely(!evtchnl))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ mutex_lock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ req = be_prepare_req(evtchnl, XENDISPL_OP_SET_CONFIG);
+ req->op.set_config.x = x;
+ req->op.set_config.y = y;
+ req->op.set_config.width = width;
+ req->op.set_config.height = height;
+ req->op.set_config.bpp = bpp;
+ req->op.set_config.fb_cookie = fb_cookie;
+
+ ret = be_stream_do_io(evtchnl, req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = be_stream_wait_io(evtchnl);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ return ret;
}
static int be_dbuf_create_int(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
@@ -44,7 +178,69 @@ static int be_dbuf_create_int(struct xen_drm_front_info
*front_info,
uint32_t bpp, uint64_t size, struct page **pages,
struct sg_table *sgt)
{
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl;
+ struct xen_drm_front_shbuf *shbuf;
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+ struct xen_drm_front_shbuf_cfg buf_cfg;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ evtchnl = &front_info->evt_pairs[GENERIC_OP_EVT_CHNL].req;
+ if (unlikely(!evtchnl))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ memset(&buf_cfg, 0, sizeof(buf_cfg));
+ buf_cfg.xb_dev = front_info->xb_dev;
+ buf_cfg.pages = pages;
+ buf_cfg.size = size;
+ buf_cfg.sgt = sgt;
+ buf_cfg.be_alloc = front_info->cfg.be_alloc;
+
+ shbuf = xen_drm_front_shbuf_alloc(&buf_cfg);
+ if (!shbuf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = dbuf_add_to_list(front_info, shbuf, dbuf_cookie);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_free(shbuf);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ req = be_prepare_req(evtchnl, XENDISPL_OP_DBUF_CREATE);
+ req->op.dbuf_create.gref_directory =
+ xen_drm_front_shbuf_get_dir_start(shbuf);
+ req->op.dbuf_create.buffer_sz = size;
+ req->op.dbuf_create.dbuf_cookie = dbuf_cookie;
+ req->op.dbuf_create.width = width;
+ req->op.dbuf_create.height = height;
+ req->op.dbuf_create.bpp = bpp;
+ if (buf_cfg.be_alloc)
+ req->op.dbuf_create.flags |= XENDISPL_DBUF_FLG_REQ_ALLOC;
+
+ ret = be_stream_do_io(evtchnl, req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ ret = be_stream_wait_io(evtchnl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ ret = xen_drm_front_shbuf_map(shbuf);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
return 0;
+
+fail:
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ dbuf_free(&front_info->dbuf_list, dbuf_cookie);
+ return ret;
}
static int be_dbuf_create_from_sgt(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
@@ -66,26 +262,144 @@ static int be_dbuf_create_from_pages(struct
xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
static int be_dbuf_destroy(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
uint64_t dbuf_cookie)
{
- return 0;
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl;
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool be_alloc;
+ int ret;
+
+ evtchnl = &front_info->evt_pairs[GENERIC_OP_EVT_CHNL].req;
+ if (unlikely(!evtchnl))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ be_alloc = front_info->cfg.be_alloc;
+
+ /*
+ * for the backend allocated buffer release references now, so backend
+ * can free the buffer
+ */
+ if (be_alloc)
+ dbuf_free(&front_info->dbuf_list, dbuf_cookie);
+
+ mutex_lock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ req = be_prepare_req(evtchnl, XENDISPL_OP_DBUF_DESTROY);
+ req->op.dbuf_destroy.dbuf_cookie = dbuf_cookie;
+
+ ret = be_stream_do_io(evtchnl, req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = be_stream_wait_io(evtchnl);
+
+ /*
+ * do this regardless of communication status with the backend:
+ * if we cannot remove remote resources remove what we can locally
+ */
+ if (!be_alloc)
+ dbuf_free(&front_info->dbuf_list, dbuf_cookie);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ return ret;
}
static int be_fb_attach(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
uint64_t dbuf_cookie, uint64_t fb_cookie, uint32_t width,
uint32_t height, uint32_t pixel_format)
{
- return 0;
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl;
+ struct xen_drm_front_dbuf *buf;
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ evtchnl = &front_info->evt_pairs[GENERIC_OP_EVT_CHNL].req;
+ if (unlikely(!evtchnl))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ buf = dbuf_get(&front_info->dbuf_list, dbuf_cookie);
+ if (!buf)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ buf->fb_cookie = fb_cookie;
+
+ mutex_lock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ req = be_prepare_req(evtchnl, XENDISPL_OP_FB_ATTACH);
+ req->op.fb_attach.dbuf_cookie = dbuf_cookie;
+ req->op.fb_attach.fb_cookie = fb_cookie;
+ req->op.fb_attach.width = width;
+ req->op.fb_attach.height = height;
+ req->op.fb_attach.pixel_format = pixel_format;
+
+ ret = be_stream_do_io(evtchnl, req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = be_stream_wait_io(evtchnl);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ return ret;
}
static int be_fb_detach(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info,
uint64_t fb_cookie)
{
- return 0;
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl;
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ evtchnl = &front_info->evt_pairs[GENERIC_OP_EVT_CHNL].req;
+ if (unlikely(!evtchnl))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ mutex_lock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ req = be_prepare_req(evtchnl, XENDISPL_OP_FB_DETACH);
+ req->op.fb_detach.fb_cookie = fb_cookie;
+
+ ret = be_stream_do_io(evtchnl, req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = be_stream_wait_io(evtchnl);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ return ret;
}
static int be_page_flip(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info, int conn_idx,
uint64_t fb_cookie)
{
- return 0;
+ struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl;
+ struct xendispl_req *req;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (unlikely(conn_idx >= front_info->num_evt_pairs))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dbuf_flush_fb(&front_info->dbuf_list, fb_cookie);
+ evtchnl = &front_info->evt_pairs[conn_idx].req;
+
+ mutex_lock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+ req = be_prepare_req(evtchnl, XENDISPL_OP_PG_FLIP);
+ req->op.pg_flip.fb_cookie = fb_cookie;
+
+ ret = be_stream_do_io(evtchnl, req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
+
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = be_stream_wait_io(evtchnl);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ return ret;
}
static void xen_drm_drv_unload(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info)
@@ -183,6 +497,7 @@ static void xen_drv_remove_internal(struct
xen_drm_front_info *front_info)
{
xen_drm_drv_deinit(front_info);
xen_drm_front_evtchnl_free_all(front_info);
+ dbuf_free_all(&front_info->dbuf_list);
}
static int backend_on_initwait(struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info)
@@ -310,6 +625,8 @@ static int xen_drv_probe(struct xenbus_device *xb_dev,
front_info->xb_dev = xb_dev;
spin_lock_init(&front_info->io_lock);
+ mutex_init(&front_info->req_io_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&front_info->dbuf_list);
front_info->drm_pdrv_registered = false;
dev_set_drvdata(&xb_dev->dev, front_info);
return xenbus_switch_state(xb_dev, XenbusStateInitialising);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.h
index c6f52c892434..db32d00145d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.h
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct xen_drm_front_info {
struct xenbus_device *xb_dev;
/* to protect data between backend IO code and interrupt handler */
spinlock_t io_lock;
+ /* serializer for backend IO: request/response */
+ struct mutex req_io_lock;
bool drm_pdrv_registered;
/* virtual DRM platform device */
struct platform_device *drm_pdev;
@@ -144,6 +146,9 @@ struct xen_drm_front_info {
int num_evt_pairs;
struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl_pair *evt_pairs;
struct xen_drm_front_cfg cfg;
+
+ /* display buffers */
+ struct list_head dbuf_list;
};
#endif /* __XEN_DRM_FRONT_H_ */
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
