[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/kdd: use mute -Warray-bounds only on new gcc version
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > "#pragma GCC diagnostic push" is supported only on gcc >= 4.6. But since > muting this the warning is needed only on gcc >= 8, do it only then, > instead of tricking the compiler about this code (and making it less > readable to the human too). > > This fixes 5888eecca0 "tools/kdd: mute spurious gcc warning". > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/debugger/kdd/kdd.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/debugger/kdd/kdd.c b/tools/debugger/kdd/kdd.c > index 61d769ece9..95c3a949ec 100644 > --- a/tools/debugger/kdd/kdd.c > +++ b/tools/debugger/kdd/kdd.c > @@ -695,10 +695,14 @@ static void kdd_handle_read_ctrl(kdd_state *s) > KDD_LOG(s, "Request outside of known control space\n"); > len = 0; > } else { > +#if __GNUC__ >= 8 > #pragma GCC diagnostic push > #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds" > +#endif > memcpy(buf, ((uint8_t *)&ctrl.c32) + offset, len); > +#if __GNUC__ >= 8 > #pragma GCC diagnostic pop > +#endif Oh thanks for the quick turnaround. Since Tim thinks it is better to not disable the warning -- how about using assert() to give the compiler a hint? Would that work? There is no need to rush for the deadline, I think the fix to this can be committed any time. Wei. > } > } > > -- > 2.13.6 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |