Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction

[Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:12:22PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:26:59AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>so it seems we have no perfect slot proposals, but 2 semi-perfect.
>>May 2nd: 16:00 - 17:00 Christopher can't attend
>>May 2nd: 17:00 - 18:00 Chao can't attend
>>Maybe a compromise would be 16:30 to 17:30
>
>Hi Lars,
>
>Your suggestion is fine with me. 16:00-17:00 is also acceptable to me. I

I meant 17:00-18:00 here.

Thanks
Chao

>don't want Christopher can't attend the whole meeting because I am just
>interested in this discussion and won't provide useful suggestions
>during the discussion.
>
>Thanks
>Chao
>
>>Regards
>>Lars
>>
>>On 21/04/2018, 05:47, "Alexey G" <x1917x@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>    On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100
>>    Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>    
>>    >On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>    >> 
>>    >> 
>>    >> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>    >> wrote:
>>    >> 
>>    >>     On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>    >> 
>>    >>   
>>    >>     >    may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those
>>    >>     > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would
>>    >>     > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following
>>    >>     > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise
>>    >>     > please scream.  
>>    >>     
>>    >>     I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April,
>>    >> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week
>>    >> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates.
>>    >>     
>>    >>     Roger.
>>    >>     
>>    >> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been
>>    >> invalidated.
>>    >> 
>>    >> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n  
>>    >
>>    >Thanks! I've already fixed my vote.
>>    >
>>    >I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items
>>    >because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely
>>    >different (albeit all related to PCI).
>>    >
>>    >Roger.
>>    
>>    1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific
>>       registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by
>>       QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses.
>>    
>>    2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this is
>>       needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated
>>       chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for #1.
>>    
>>    I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make the
>>    multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated MMCONFIG
>>    before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at least
>>    3 possible directions currently to solve this problem.
>>    
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Xen-devel mailing list
>>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel