Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Alright: 17:00-18:00 it is. I will send out a separate mail with call-in details
Lars

On 23/04/2018, 15:24, "Chao Gao" <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:12:22PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
    >On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:26:59AM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote:
    >>Hi all,
    >>so it seems we have no perfect slot proposals, but 2 semi-perfect.
    >>May 2nd: 16:00 - 17:00 Christopher can't attend
    >>May 2nd: 17:00 - 18:00 Chao can't attend
    >>Maybe a compromise would be 16:30 to 17:30
    >
    >Hi Lars,
    >
    >Your suggestion is fine with me. 16:00-17:00 is also acceptable to me. I
    
    I meant 17:00-18:00 here.
    
    Thanks
    Chao
    
    >don't want Christopher can't attend the whole meeting because I am just
    >interested in this discussion and won't provide useful suggestions
    >during the discussion.
    >
    >Thanks
    >Chao
    >
    >>Regards
    >>Lars
    >>
    >>On 21/04/2018, 05:47, "Alexey G" <x1917x@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >>
    >>    On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100
    >>    Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >>    
    >>    >On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
    >>    >> 
    >>    >> 
    >>    >> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
    >>    >> wrote:
    >>    >> 
    >>    >>     On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
    >>    >> 
    >>    >>   
    >>    >>     >    may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at 
those
    >>    >>     > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would
    >>    >>     > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the 
following
    >>    >>     > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. 
Otherwise
    >>    >>     > please scream.  
    >>    >>     
    >>    >>     I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April,
    >>    >> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the 
week
    >>    >> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates.
    >>    >>     
    >>    >>     Roger.
    >>    >>     
    >>    >> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been
    >>    >> invalidated.
    >>    >> 
    >>    >> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n  
    >>    >
    >>    >Thanks! I've already fixed my vote.
    >>    >
    >>    >I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items
    >>    >because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely
    >>    >different (albeit all related to PCI).
    >>    >
    >>    >Roger.
    >>    
    >>    1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific
    >>       registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by
    >>       QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses.
    >>    
    >>    2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this 
is
    >>       needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated
    >>       chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for 
#1.
    >>    
    >>    I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make 
the
    >>    multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated 
MMCONFIG
    >>    before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at 
least
    >>    3 possible directions currently to solve this problem.
    >>    
    >>
    >>_______________________________________________
    >>Xen-devel mailing list
    >>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
    

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel