[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/8] x86/vlapic: use apic_id array to set initial (x2)APIC ID



On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:04:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.01.18 at 05:01, <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
>> @@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ struct hvm_domain {
>>      uint8_t thread_per_core;
>>  };
>>  
>> +#define hvm_vcpu_x2apic_id(v) 
>> (v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.apic_id[v->vcpu_id])
>
>I can't seem to find where you set up this array.
>
>> +#define hvm_vcpu_apic_id(v) (hvm_vcpu_x2apic_id(v) % 255)
>
>I don't think the % 255 is appropriate here - the macro simply shouldn't be
>invoked in such a case.
>
>On the whole I'm not convinced using a array is appropriate - calculating
>the APIC ID should be very involved, and require much less than possibly
>multiple kb of storage.

APIC ID can be inferred from a 3-tuple (socket ID, core ID and thread
ID). If we want to give admin the ability to set the mapping between
vcpu_id and this 3-tuple to anything he wants (such vcpu0 - socket ID 1
core ID 0 thread ID 3 and vcpu1 - socket ID 0 core ID 1 thread ID 0...),
IMO, we have no way to avoid store some related information (an APIC ID
array or an 3-tuple array) except limiting the flexibility of guest CPU
topology. At least, I want to emulate a CPU and cache topology which is
similar to KNM's, namely each core has 4 logical threads and two cores
share the same L2 cache.

Thanks
Chao

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.