[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.11 v2 2/2] Add new add_maintainers.pl script to optimise the workflow when using git format-patch with get_maintainer.pl
On 02/05/2018, 12:45, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 v2 2/2] Add new add_maintainers.pl script to optimise the workflow when using git format-patch with get_maintainer.pl"): > On 02/05/2018, 11:50, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the address is a mailing list for some other stanza in MAINTAINERS, > ie for a stanza whose files are not touched by this patch, then it > should still be treated as a list. > > So what I meant was that you should search the whole of MAINTAINERS > yourself for all the L: lines, regardless of where they appear. > > But that is exactly what get_maintainers.pl --nom --nor does mariner:xen.git> scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nom --nor scripts/get_maintainer.pl: missing patchfile or -f file - use --help if necessary It requires a patch. But for this purpose, we don't want any patch. > That avoids calling get_maintainer.pl twice too, so helpfully the > other difficulties you discuss go away. > > I suppose it does. But it also makes the script re-implement bits > of get_maintainers.pl Finding lines starting with L: is so simple that I wouldn't bother calling get_maintainer.pl for it. OK. I will do that then. > > We could make this configurable: > > Default: all tags, except signed-off-by (unless of course this should be added to the CC) > > Why not CC the S-o-b ? Usually that will be the author anyway. > > I wasn't sure. > > Particularly if you used -i ccbody, which we agreed in another mail should > be the default, you then will end up with > CC: lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx > ... > Signed-off-by: lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx > > Which would annoy me personally. Ideally no-one should be mentioned in the CC that is mentioned in some other tag. CC: lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx Tested-by: lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx is just as silly. That tells me that that entire --tags infrastructure should only be used when inserting into the header and ignored otherwise. This makes everything simpler. No need to include extra options, etc. If --tags is there, then a) Retrieve any tags via the *-by: regex b) Only insert at the top of the mail Then there is really no reason why to do anything more complex. Regards Lars _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |