Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] xen/kbdif: Add string constants for raw pointer

[Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/17/2018 07:28 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 16/05/18 06:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > On 05/11/2018 06:15 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 11/05/18 15:38, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 09:37:57AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:49:18PM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add missing string constants for {feature|request}-raw-pointer
> > > > > > to align with the rest of the interface file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes 7868654ff7fe ("kbdif: Define "feature-raw-pointer" and
> > > > > > "request-raw-pointer")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
> > > > > > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Juergen, you OK with an release-ack?
> > > Yes:
> > >
> > > Release-acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > Is this ack for both patches or this one only?
> It was meant for patch 1 only.
Clear
> > I see Konrad has applied this patch, but
> > "[Xen-devel][PATCH v4 2/2] xen/kbdif: Add features to disable keyboard
> > and pointer"
> > is still floating.
> In principle I'm fine with taking it for 4.11, but I think at this stage
> of the release there should be a formal request to include it.
...and the request should come from Konrad?
Or who else may request that?

And, as I have r-b's from Konrad for both patches,
will it be ok if we apply the corresponding changes to the
kernel now, so my change to xen-kbdfront is unblocked?
> Juergen
Thank you,
Oleksandr

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel