[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/vmx: Improvements to LBR MSR handling
>>> On 08.06.18 at 20:48, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -3106,14 +3104,13 @@ static int vmx_msr_write_intercept(unsigned int msr, > uint64_t msr_content) > for ( ; (rc == 0) && lbr->count; lbr++ ) > for ( i = 0; (rc == 0) && (i < lbr->count); i++ ) > if ( (rc = vmx_add_guest_msr(v, lbr->base + i)) == 0 ) > - { > vmx_clear_msr_intercept(v, lbr->base + i, > VMX_MSR_RW); > - if ( lbr_tsx_fixup_needed ) > - v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_fixup_enabled |= > FIXUP_LBR_TSX; > - if ( bdw_erratum_bdf14_fixup_needed ) > - v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_fixup_enabled |= > - FIXUP_BDW_ERRATUM_BDF14; > - } > + > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_flags |= LBR_MSRS_INSERTED; > + if ( lbr_tsx_fixup_needed ) > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_flags |= LBR_FIXUP_TSX; > + if ( bdw_erratum_bdf14_fixup_needed ) > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_flags |= LBR_FIXUP_BDF14; Note how the setting of the flags previously depended on vmx_add_guest_msr() having returned success at least once. > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h > @@ -156,7 +156,12 @@ struct arch_vmx_struct { > /* Are we emulating rather than VMENTERing? */ > uint8_t vmx_emulate; > > - uint8_t lbr_fixup_enabled; > + /* Flags for LBR MSRs in the load/save lists. */ > +#define LBR_MSRS_INSERTED (1u << 0) > +#define LBR_FIXUP_TSX (1u << 1) > +#define LBR_FIXUP_BDF14 (1u << 2) > +#define LBR_FIXUP_MASK (LBR_FIXUP_TSX | LBR_FIXUP_BDF14) > + uint8_t lbr_flags; I'm not overly happy with these getting moved to a non-private header, but I assume you need to use the new flag in vmcs.c in a later patch. Let's hope no other LBR_-prefixed names appear elsewhere in the code. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |