[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 125358: regressions - FAIL
flight 125358 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125358/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 125295 build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 125295 build-i386-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 125295 build-i386 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 125295 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a build-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a build-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a version targeted for testing: ovmf f63a3e286765f47b79a73d56f8d687c4f3733979 baseline version: ovmf d900d7c9857a676d9271a0ab499c12b379dc3652 Last test of basis 125295 2018-07-18 03:40:40 Z 1 days Testing same since 125302 2018-07-18 07:10:48 Z 0 days 7 attempts ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> jobs: build-amd64-xsm fail build-i386-xsm fail build-amd64 fail build-i386 fail build-amd64-libvirt blocked build-i386-libvirt blocked build-amd64-pvops pass build-i386-pvops pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ commit f63a3e286765f47b79a73d56f8d687c4f3733979 Author: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Jul 12 18:21:01 2018 +0800 UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Load uCode once for each core. The SDM requires only one thread per core to load the microcode. This change enables this solution. Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> commit 2a08913443bb3fff0056cc555e260b2c3fdd2120 Author: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Jul 11 19:07:28 2018 +0800 UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use BSP uCode for APs if possible. Search uCode costs much time, if AP has same processor type with BSP, AP can use BSP saved uCode info to get better performance. This change enables this solution. Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> commit 6936ee0342d25bea9f44499444ba1e4df6fc2200 Author: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jul 13 08:40:27 2018 +0800 UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate uCode to memory to save time. Read uCode from memory has better performance than from flash. But it needs extra effort to let BSP copy uCode from flash to memory. Also BSP already enable cache in SEC phase, so it use less time to relocate uCode from flash to memory. After verification, if system has more than one processor, it will reduce some time if load uCode from memory. This change enable this optimization. Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |