Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 1/6] arm: add SMC wrapper that is compatible with SMCCC

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 27.08.18 at 21:24, <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> 
> On 27.08.18 09:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>   xen/arch/arm/arm32/Makefile      |  1 +
>>>   xen/arch/arm/arm32/smc.S         | 39 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/arm64/Makefile      |  1 +
>>>   xen/arch/arm/arm64/asm-offsets.c |  4 ++++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/arm64/smc.S         | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h  | 11 +++++++++++
>>>   6 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/arm32/smc.S
>>>   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/arm64/smc.S
>> 
>> With this diffstat, why did I end up on the _To_ list of this patch?
>> I shouldn't even have been on the Cc list (and I'm going to blindly
>> delete all other patches of this series where you've also
>> apparently put me on the To list). Please remember that patches
>> are supposed to be sent _To_ the list, with maintainers, reviewers
>> (and perhaps others) Cc-ed. Together with people replying to
>> mails often not adjusting To/Cc lists accordingly, I've now ended
>> up with well over 30 mails in my primary mail folder which
>> presumably I have no business with at all.
> 
> My apologies for disturbing you. I really have no intention to upset you.
> I used get_maintainer.pl script and it showed your e-mail address. So I 
> added you to To: list.

On top of Julien's reply this _still_ leaves the question of why
you've added me to the To list then, rather than the Cc one.

And btw - script and other bugs happen. Please add some salt
to their output.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel