[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] x86/hvm: Switch hvm_allow_get_param() to use a whitelist
>>> On 06.09.18 at 17:21, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/09/18 09:56, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> @@ -4390,9 +4411,6 @@ static int hvmop_get_param( >>> if ( copy_from_guest(&a, arg, 1) ) >>> return -EFAULT; >>> >>> - if ( a.index >= HVM_NR_PARAMS ) >>> - return -EINVAL; >>> - >> ASSERT, just in case someone screws up the allow function in future? > > That's not going to help in any practical way. This check does really > exist, and is part of the switch statement. Which switch() statement? The one in the allow function includes this, but the one here simply has default: a.value = d->arch.hvm.params[a.index]; break; Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |