Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/18] INSTALL: Mention kconfig

[Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:24:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH 10/18] INSTALL: Mention kconfig"):
> > On 08.10.18 at 16:08, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Thanks, I'll take that as an ack.  (Assuming you did indeed mean
> > > `accepting' rather than `excepting'.)
> > 
> > Well, no, it was not meant as an ack, merely as the absence of further
> > objections. (And yes, I did mean "accepting".)
> 
> Err, OK.
> 
> Doug, do you want me to propose a different or expanded wording ?
> 
> Ian.

No. I think this good. It sheds light on something that was black magic
and that's good. I think you've started the conversation on how we see
XEN_CONFIG_EXPERT evolving (due to the shim config) and that's great
too. +1 from me.

--
Doug

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel