[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 43/49] x86emul: support AVX512_4VNNIW insns
As in a few cases before, since the insns here and in particular their memory access patterns follow the AVX512_4FMAPS scheme, I didn't think it was necessary to add contrived tests specifically for them, beyond the Disp8 scaling ones. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- v7: Re-base. v6: New. --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c @@ -545,6 +545,11 @@ static const struct test avx512_4fmaps_5 INSN(4fnmaddss, f2, 0f38, ab, el_4, d, vl), }; +static const struct test avx512_4vnniw_512[] = { + INSN(p4dpwssd, f2, 0f38, 52, el_4, d, vl), + INSN(p4dpwssds, f2, 0f38, 53, el_4, d, vl), +}; + static const struct test avx512_bitalg_all[] = { INSN(popcnt, 66, 0f38, 54, vl, bw, vl), INSN(pshufbitqmb, 66, 0f38, 8f, vl, b, vl), @@ -949,6 +954,7 @@ void evex_disp8_test(void *instr, struct #define cpu_has_avx512pf cpu_has_avx512f RUN(avx512pf, 512); RUN(avx512_4fmaps, 512); + RUN(avx512_4vnniw, 512); RUN(avx512_bitalg, all); RUN(avx512_ifma, all); RUN(avx512_vbmi, all); --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/x86-emulate.h +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/x86-emulate.h @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static inline bool xcr0_mask(uint64_t ma #define cpu_has_avx512_vbmi2 (cp.feat.avx512_vbmi2 && xcr0_mask(0xe6)) #define cpu_has_avx512_bitalg (cp.feat.avx512_bitalg && xcr0_mask(0xe6)) #define cpu_has_avx512_vpopcntdq (cp.feat.avx512_vpopcntdq && xcr0_mask(0xe6)) +#define cpu_has_avx512_4vnniw (cp.feat.avx512_4vnniw && xcr0_mask(0xe6)) #define cpu_has_avx512_4fmaps (cp.feat.avx512_4fmaps && xcr0_mask(0xe6)) #define cpu_has_xgetbv1 (cpu_has_xsave && cp.xstate.xgetbv1) --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ static const struct ext0f38_table { [0x4d] = { .simd_size = simd_scalar_vexw, .d8s = d8s_dq }, [0x4e] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_fp, .two_op = 1, .d8s = d8s_vl }, [0x4f] = { .simd_size = simd_scalar_vexw, .d8s = d8s_dq }, + [0x52 ... 0x53] = { .simd_size = simd_128, .d8s = 4 }, [0x54 ... 0x55] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .two_op = 1, .d8s = d8s_vl }, [0x58] = { .simd_size = simd_other, .two_op = 1, .d8s = 2 }, [0x59] = { .simd_size = simd_other, .two_op = 1, .d8s = 3 }, @@ -1923,6 +1924,7 @@ static bool vcpu_has( #define vcpu_has_avx512_vbmi2() vcpu_has( 7, ECX, 6, ctxt, ops) #define vcpu_has_avx512_bitalg() vcpu_has( 7, ECX, 12, ctxt, ops) #define vcpu_has_avx512_vpopcntdq() vcpu_has( 7, ECX, 14, ctxt, ops) +#define vcpu_has_avx512_4vnniw() vcpu_has( 7, EDX, 2, ctxt, ops) #define vcpu_has_avx512_4fmaps() vcpu_has( 7, EDX, 3, ctxt, ops) #define vcpu_has_rdpid() vcpu_has( 7, ECX, 22, ctxt, ops) #define vcpu_has_clzero() vcpu_has(0x80000008, EBX, 0, ctxt, ops) @@ -8933,6 +8935,15 @@ x86_emulate( generate_exception_if(vex.l, EXC_UD); goto simd_0f_avx; + case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_F2(0x0f38, 0x52): /* vp4dpwssd m128,zmm+3,zmm{k} */ + case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_F2(0x0f38, 0x53): /* vp4dpwssds m128,zmm+3,zmm{k} */ + host_and_vcpu_must_have(avx512_4vnniw); + generate_exception_if((ea.type != OP_MEM || evex.w || evex.brs || + evex.lr != 2), + EXC_UD); + op_mask = op_mask & 0xffff ? 0xf : 0; + goto simd_zmm; + case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x8f): /* vpshufbitqmb [xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,k{k} */ generate_exception_if(evex.w || !evex.r || !evex.R || evex.z, EXC_UD); /* fall through */ --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ #define cpu_has_rdpid boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RDPID) /* CPUID level 0x00000007:0.edx */ +#define cpu_has_avx512_4vnniw boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4VNNIW) #define cpu_has_avx512_4fmaps boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4FMAPS) /* CPUID level 0x80000007.edx */ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |