Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/passthrough: put the x86 folder under x86 maintainership

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 07.01.19 at 13:14, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:51:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > passthrough/x86 is tied to the x86 code, and as such put it under x86
>> > maintainership.
>> 
>> It is tied to both, so at the very least I object to ...
>> 
>> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> > @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ F:     xen/drivers/passthrough/
>> >  X:        xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
>> >  X:        xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/
>> >  X:        xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/
>> > +X:        xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/
>> 
>> ... this; the Arm entry here is questionable too, imo.
>> 
>> > @@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ R:     Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >  S:        Supported
>> >  L:        xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> >  F:        xen/arch/x86/
>> > +F:        xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/
>> 
>> This one's debatable.
> 
> So you would agree to adding xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ under x86
> maintainership as long as it's also left under the generic IOMMU
> support entry?

"Agree" goes to far; I think this is worth considering. I'm also not
opposed to leaving things as they are.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel