Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/passthrough: put the x86 folder under x86 maintainership

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:51:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > passthrough/x86 is tied to the x86 code, and as such put it under x86
> > maintainership.
> 
> It is tied to both, so at the very least I object to ...
> 
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ F:      xen/drivers/passthrough/
> >  X: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
> >  X: xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/
> >  X: xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/
> > +X: xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/
> 
> ... this; the Arm entry here is questionable too, imo.
> 
> > @@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ R:      Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >  S: Supported
> >  L: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >  F: xen/arch/x86/
> > +F: xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/
> 
> This one's debatable.

So you would agree to adding xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ under x86
maintainership as long as it's also left under the generic IOMMU
support entry?

Thanks, Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel