[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] x86: stop handling MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS save/restore in implementation code
>>> On 11.03.19 at 17:10, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 08 March 2019 16:40 >> >> >>> On 07.01.19 at 13:02, <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > @@ -3472,12 +3494,6 @@ int hvm_msr_read_intercept(unsigned int msr, >> > uint64_t *msr_content) >> > *msr_content = v->arch.hvm.msr_xss; >> > break; >> > >> > - case MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS: >> > - if ( !d->arch.cpuid->feat.mpx || >> > - !hvm_get_guest_bndcfgs(v, msr_content) ) >> > - goto gp_fault; >> > - break; >> >> Note how this already checks the CPUID policy, somewhat contrary to >> what you say in the commit message. I think this wants to remain this >> way in guest_{rd,wr}msr() - see all the other CPUID policy checks there. >> That way hvm_get_guest_bndcfgs() can be made consistent with the >> hook pointer type again, and it can remain an inline function as before. > > I thought it was neater to put the check inside the helper but I can pull it > out into the switch statement if that's preferred. Unless Andrew explicitly tells you otherwise, please do for the sake of consistency with other code in that switch(). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |