[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/mm: Clean up p2m_finish_type_change return value
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 22 March 2019 12:09 > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; Andrew Cooper > <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau Monne > <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; > George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Alexandru Stefan ISAILA > <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH v3] x86/mm: Clean up p2m_finish_type_change return value > > In the case of any errors, finish_type_change() passes values returned > from p2m->recalc() up the stack (with some exceptions in the case where > an error is expected); this eventually ends up being returned to the > XEN_DOMOP_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server hypercall. > > However, on Intel processors (but not on AMD processor), p2m->recalc() > can also return '1' as well as '0'. This case is handled very > inconsistently: finish_type_change() will return the value of the final > entry it attempts, discarding results for other entries; > p2m_finish_type_change() will attempt to accumulate '1's, so that it > returns '1' if any of the calls to finish_type_change() returns '1'; and > dm_op() will again return '1' only if the very last call to > p2m_finish_type_change() returns '1'. The result is that the > XEN_DMOP_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server() hypercall will sometimes return > 0 and sometimes return 1 on success, in an unpredictable manner. > > The hypercall documentation doesn't mention return values; but it's not > clear what the caller could do with the information about whether > entries had been changed or not. At the moment it's always 0 on AMD > boxes, and *usually* 1 on Intel boxes; so nothing can be relying on a > '1' return value for correctness (or if it is, it's broken). > > Make the return value on success consistently '0' by only returning > 0/-ERROR from finish_type_change(). Also remove the accumulation code > from p2m_finish_type_change(). Sorry, I don't think I was cc-ed on the original and I managed to miss George cc-ing me on his response to v2. Digging into the code a bit I can't honestly see what the point of returning anything other than 0/-errno out of p2m->recalc is. The only use of rc > 0 from p2m-ept.c:resolve_misconfig() is in ept_handle_misconfig() AFAICT so it would make more sense to me to tighten up the semantics of recalc (which I believe Jan suggested in response to v1) and turn any > 0 return from resolve_misconfig() into 0. So, the code below looks fine but the patch just needs to do a little more (and then your rc < 0 test can also be simplified to !rc too). Paul > > Suggested-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > Changes since V2: > - Update commit msg. > --- > xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 11 +++-------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > index b9bbb8f485..bcf8cad423 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > @@ -1213,22 +1213,17 @@ int p2m_finish_type_change(struct domain *d, > if ( d->arch.altp2m_eptp[i] != mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) ) > { > struct p2m_domain *altp2m = d->arch.altp2m_p2m[i]; > - int rc1; > > p2m_lock(altp2m); > - rc1 = finish_type_change(altp2m, first_gfn, max_nr); > + rc = finish_type_change(altp2m, first_gfn, max_nr); > p2m_unlock(altp2m); > > - if ( rc1 < 0 ) > - { > - rc = rc1; > + if ( rc < 0 ) > goto out; > - } > - > - rc |= rc1; > } > } > #endif > + rc = 0; > > out: > p2m_unlock(hostp2m); > -- > 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |