[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/12] xen/arm64: sysreg: Implement the 32-bit helpers using the 64-bit helpers
Clang is pickier than GCC for the register size in asm statement. It expects the register size to match the value size. The instructions msr/mrs are expecting a 64-bit register. This means the implementation of the 32-bit helpers is not correct. The easiest solution is to implement the 32-bit helpers using the 64-bit helpers. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> --- xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/sysregs.h | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/sysregs.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/sysregs.h index 08585a969e..c60029d38f 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/sysregs.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/sysregs.h @@ -59,14 +59,9 @@ /* Access to system registers */ -#define READ_SYSREG32(name) ({ \ - uint32_t _r; \ - asm volatile("mrs %0, "__stringify(name) : "=r" (_r)); \ - _r; }) -#define WRITE_SYSREG32(v, name) do { \ - uint32_t _r = v; \ - asm volatile("msr "__stringify(name)", %0" : : "r" (_r)); \ -} while (0) +#define READ_SYSREG32(name) ((uint32_t)READ_SYSREG64(name)) + +#define WRITE_SYSREG32(v, name) WRITE_SYSREG64((uint64_t)v, name) #define WRITE_SYSREG64(v, name) do { \ uint64_t _r = v; \ -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |