[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/mm: Introduce altp2m_get_gfn_type_access
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:03 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 09.04.2019 16:48, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:04 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA > > <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> This patch moves common code from p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access() and > >> p2m_change_altp2m_gfn() into one function > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> --- > >> Changes since V2: > >> - Change var name from found_in_hostp2m to copied_from_hostp2m > >> - Move the type check from altp2m_get_gfn_type_access() to the > >> callers. > >> --- > >> xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c | 32 ++++++++++++---------------- > >> xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 41 ++++++++++++++---------------------- > >> xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++ > >> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c > >> index 56c06a4fc6..bf67ddb15a 100644 > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c > >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c > >> @@ -265,31 +265,27 @@ int p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access(struct domain *d, > >> struct p2m_domain *hp2m, > >> unsigned int page_order; > >> unsigned long gfn_l = gfn_x(gfn); > >> int rc; > >> + bool copied_from_hostp2m; > >> > >> - mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, gfn, &t, &old_a, 0, NULL, NULL); > >> + mfn = altp2m_get_gfn_type_access(ap2m, gfn, &t, &old_a, &page_order, > >> &copied_from_hostp2m); > >> > >> - /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */ > >> if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) ) > >> + return -ESRCH; > >> + > >> + /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */ > >> + if ( page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K && copied_from_hostp2m ) > >> { > >> + unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1); > >> + gfn_t gfn2 = _gfn(gfn_l & mask); > >> + mfn_t mfn2 = _mfn(mfn_x(mfn) & mask); > >> > >> - mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_l, &t, &old_a, > >> - P2M_ALLOC | P2M_UNSHARE, &page_order, > >> 0); > >> + /* Note: currently it is not safe to remap to a shared entry */ > >> + if ( t != p2m_ram_rw ) > >> + return -ESRCH; > >> > >> - rc = -ESRCH; > >> - if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) || t != p2m_ram_rw ) > >> + rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn2, mfn2, page_order, t, old_a, 1); > >> + if ( rc ) > >> return rc; > >> - > >> - /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */ > >> - if ( page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K ) > >> - { > >> - unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1); > >> - gfn_t gfn2 = _gfn(gfn_l & mask); > >> - mfn_t mfn2 = _mfn(mfn_x(mfn) & mask); > >> - > >> - rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn2, mfn2, page_order, t, old_a, > >> 1); > >> - if ( rc ) > >> - return rc; > >> - } > >> } > >> > >> /* > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > >> index b9bbb8f485..d38d7c29ca 100644 > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > >> @@ -2626,6 +2626,7 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, unsigned > >> int idx, > >> mfn_t mfn; > >> unsigned int page_order; > >> int rc = -EINVAL; > >> + bool copied_from_hostp2m; > >> > >> if ( idx >= MAX_ALTP2M || d->arch.altp2m_eptp[idx] == > >> mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) ) > >> return rc; > >> @@ -2636,7 +2637,7 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, unsigned > >> int idx, > >> p2m_lock(hp2m); > >> p2m_lock(ap2m); > >> > >> - mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, old_gfn, &t, &a, 0, NULL, NULL); > >> + mfn = altp2m_get_gfn_type_access(ap2m, old_gfn, &t, &a, &page_order, > >> &copied_from_hostp2m); > >> > >> if ( gfn_eq(new_gfn, INVALID_GFN) ) > >> { > >> @@ -2646,37 +2647,27 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, > >> unsigned int idx, > >> goto out; > >> } > >> > >> - /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */ > >> - if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) ) > >> - { > >> - mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_x(old_gfn), &t, &a, > >> - P2M_ALLOC, &page_order, 0); > >> + if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) || (t != p2m_ram_rw && copied_from_hostp2m) ) > > > > Is this check correct? Why do you want to get out only when type is > > non-rw *and* it's copied from the hostp2m? You could have non-rw > > entries like mmio in the altp2m that were lazily copied and I don't > > think we want to allow remapping to those either. > > I just copied the functionality. If this is needed I will add a || t != > p2m_mmio_dm and p2m_mmio_direct. My problem is with the && copied_form_hostp2m part. Why is that a criteria? Tamas _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |