[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/mm: Introduce altp2m_get_gfn_type_access
On 09.04.2019 17:37, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:03 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA > <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 09.04.2019 16:48, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:04 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA >>> <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> This patch moves common code from p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access() and >>>> p2m_change_altp2m_gfn() into one function >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Changes since V2: >>>> - Change var name from found_in_hostp2m to copied_from_hostp2m >>>> - Move the type check from altp2m_get_gfn_type_access() to the >>>> callers. >>>> --- >>>> xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c | 32 ++++++++++++---------------- >>>> xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 41 ++++++++++++++---------------------- >>>> xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c >>>> index 56c06a4fc6..bf67ddb15a 100644 >>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c >>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c >>>> @@ -265,31 +265,27 @@ int p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access(struct domain *d, >>>> struct p2m_domain *hp2m, >>>> unsigned int page_order; >>>> unsigned long gfn_l = gfn_x(gfn); >>>> int rc; >>>> + bool copied_from_hostp2m; >>>> >>>> - mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, gfn, &t, &old_a, 0, NULL, NULL); >>>> + mfn = altp2m_get_gfn_type_access(ap2m, gfn, &t, &old_a, &page_order, >>>> &copied_from_hostp2m); >>>> >>>> - /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */ >>>> if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) ) >>>> + return -ESRCH; >>>> + >>>> + /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */ >>>> + if ( page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K && copied_from_hostp2m ) >>>> { >>>> + unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1); >>>> + gfn_t gfn2 = _gfn(gfn_l & mask); >>>> + mfn_t mfn2 = _mfn(mfn_x(mfn) & mask); >>>> >>>> - mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_l, &t, &old_a, >>>> - P2M_ALLOC | P2M_UNSHARE, &page_order, >>>> 0); >>>> + /* Note: currently it is not safe to remap to a shared entry */ >>>> + if ( t != p2m_ram_rw ) >>>> + return -ESRCH; >>>> >>>> - rc = -ESRCH; >>>> - if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) || t != p2m_ram_rw ) >>>> + rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn2, mfn2, page_order, t, old_a, 1); >>>> + if ( rc ) >>>> return rc; >>>> - >>>> - /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */ >>>> - if ( page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K ) >>>> - { >>>> - unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1); >>>> - gfn_t gfn2 = _gfn(gfn_l & mask); >>>> - mfn_t mfn2 = _mfn(mfn_x(mfn) & mask); >>>> - >>>> - rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn2, mfn2, page_order, t, old_a, >>>> 1); >>>> - if ( rc ) >>>> - return rc; >>>> - } >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* >>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c >>>> index b9bbb8f485..d38d7c29ca 100644 >>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c >>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c >>>> @@ -2626,6 +2626,7 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, unsigned >>>> int idx, >>>> mfn_t mfn; >>>> unsigned int page_order; >>>> int rc = -EINVAL; >>>> + bool copied_from_hostp2m; >>>> >>>> if ( idx >= MAX_ALTP2M || d->arch.altp2m_eptp[idx] == >>>> mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) ) >>>> return rc; >>>> @@ -2636,7 +2637,7 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, unsigned >>>> int idx, >>>> p2m_lock(hp2m); >>>> p2m_lock(ap2m); >>>> >>>> - mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, old_gfn, &t, &a, 0, NULL, NULL); >>>> + mfn = altp2m_get_gfn_type_access(ap2m, old_gfn, &t, &a, &page_order, >>>> &copied_from_hostp2m); >>>> >>>> if ( gfn_eq(new_gfn, INVALID_GFN) ) >>>> { >>>> @@ -2646,37 +2647,27 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, >>>> unsigned int idx, >>>> goto out; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */ >>>> - if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) ) >>>> - { >>>> - mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_x(old_gfn), &t, &a, >>>> - P2M_ALLOC, &page_order, 0); >>>> + if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) || (t != p2m_ram_rw && copied_from_hostp2m) ) >>> >>> Is this check correct? Why do you want to get out only when type is >>> non-rw *and* it's copied from the hostp2m? You could have non-rw >>> entries like mmio in the altp2m that were lazily copied and I don't >>> think we want to allow remapping to those either. >> >> I just copied the functionality. If this is needed I will add a || t != >> p2m_mmio_dm and p2m_mmio_direct. > > My problem is with the && copied_form_hostp2m part. Why is that a criteria? The (t != p2m_ram_rw) check was done only for the get from hostp2m. If you think that I should do the check for all mfns (hostp2 and altp2m) then I can drop the copied_from_hostp2m bool and add mmio check. I hope I understand the problem correctly. Alex _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |