Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/20] xen/arm: processor: Use _BITUL instead of _AC(1, U) in SCTLR_ defines

[Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Julien,

On 22.04.19 19:49, Julien Grall wrote:
> The newly introduced macro _BITUL makes the code more readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 18 +++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
> index c6f56490b3..1a143fb6a3 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
> @@ -115,20 +115,20 @@
>   
>   /* Bits specific to SCTLR_EL1 for Arm32 */
>   
> -#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V     (_AC(1,U)<<13)
> +#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V     _BITUL(13)
>   
>   /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx for Arm32 */
>   
> -#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE    (_AC(1,U)<<30)
> -#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI    (_AC(1,U)<<21)
> +#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE    _BITUL(30)
> +#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI    _BITUL(21)
>   
>   /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx on all architectures */
> -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE    (_AC(1,U)<<25)
> -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN   (_AC(1,U)<<19)
> -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I     (_AC(1,U)<<12)
> -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C     (_AC(1,U)<<2)
> -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A     (_AC(1,U)<<1)
> -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M     (_AC(1,U)<<0)
> +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE    _BITUL(25)
> +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN   _BITUL(19)
> +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I     _BITUL(12)
> +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C     _BITUL(2)
> +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A     _BITUL(1)
> +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M     _BITUL(0)
>   
>   #define HSCTLR_BASE     _AC(0x30c51878,U)
>   
Resolution of the dispute with Jan about [PATCH 01/20] is required first.

--
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel