[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/20] xen/arm: processor: Use _BITUL instead of _AC(1, U) in SCTLR_ defines
On 03/05/2019 16:56, Andrii Anisov wrote: Hello Julien, On 22.04.19 19:49, Julien Grall wrote:The newly introduced macro _BITUL makes the code more readable. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> --- xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h index c6f56490b3..1a143fb6a3 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h @@ -115,20 +115,20 @@ /* Bits specific to SCTLR_EL1 for Arm32 */ -#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V (_AC(1,U)<<13) +#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V _BITUL(13) /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx for Arm32 */ -#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE (_AC(1,U)<<30) -#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI (_AC(1,U)<<21) +#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE _BITUL(30) +#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI _BITUL(21) /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx on all architectures */ -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE (_AC(1,U)<<25) -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN (_AC(1,U)<<19) -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I (_AC(1,U)<<12) -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C (_AC(1,U)<<2) -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A (_AC(1,U)<<1) -#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M (_AC(1,U)<<0) +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE _BITUL(25) +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN _BITUL(19) +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I _BITUL(12) +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C _BITUL(2) +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A _BITUL(1) +#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M _BITUL(0) #define HSCTLR_BASE _AC(0x30c51878,U)Resolution of the dispute with Jan about [PATCH 01/20] is required first. I don't understand what is your "second". Does it mean you are happy with the idea of the patch but we should agree on the naming first? Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |