[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/IRQ: fix locking around vector management
>>> On 08.05.19 at 15:10, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > All of __{assign,bind,clear}_irq_vector() manipulate struct irq_desc > fields, and hence ought to be called with the descriptor lock held in > addition to vector_lock. This is currently the case for only > set_desc_affinity() (in the common case) and destroy_irq(), which also > clarifies what the nesting behavior between the locks has to be. > Reflect the new expectation by having these functions all take a > descriptor as parameter instead of an interrupt number. > > Also take care of the two special cases of calls to set_desc_affinity(): > set_ioapic_affinity_irq() and VT-d's dma_msi_set_affinity() get called > directly as well, and in these cases the descriptor locks hadn't got > acquired till now. For set_ioapic_affinity_irq() this means acquiring / > releasing of the IO-APIC lock can be plain spin_{,un}lock() then. > > Drop one of the two leading underscores from all three functions at > the same time. > > There's one case left where descriptors get manipulated with just > vector_lock held: setup_vector_irq() assumes its caller to acquire > vector_lock, and hence can't itself acquire the descriptor locks (wrong > lock order). I don't currently see how to address this. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: Also adjust set_ioapic_affinity_irq() and VT-d's > dma_msi_set_affinity(). I'm sorry, Kevin, I should have Cc-ed you on this one. Jan > --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c > @@ -550,14 +550,14 @@ static void clear_IO_APIC (void) > static void > set_ioapic_affinity_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask) > { > - unsigned long flags; > unsigned int dest; > int pin, irq; > struct irq_pin_list *entry; > > irq = desc->irq; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags); > + spin_lock(&ioapic_lock); > + > dest = set_desc_affinity(desc, mask); > if (dest != BAD_APICID) { > if ( !x2apic_enabled ) > @@ -580,8 +580,8 @@ set_ioapic_affinity_irq(struct irq_desc > entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next; > } > } > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags); > > + spin_unlock(&ioapic_lock); > } > > /* > @@ -674,16 +674,19 @@ void /*__init*/ setup_ioapic_dest(void) > for (ioapic = 0; ioapic < nr_ioapics; ioapic++) { > for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_entries[ioapic]; pin++) { > struct irq_desc *desc; > + unsigned long flags; > > irq_entry = find_irq_entry(ioapic, pin, mp_INT); > if (irq_entry == -1) > continue; > irq = pin_2_irq(irq_entry, ioapic, pin); > desc = irq_to_desc(irq); > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); > BUG_ON(!cpumask_intersects(desc->arch.cpu_mask, > &cpu_online_map)); > set_ioapic_affinity_irq(desc, desc->arch.cpu_mask); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > } > - > } > } > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > #include <public/physdev.h> > > static int parse_irq_vector_map_param(const char *s); > +static void _clear_irq_vector(struct irq_desc *desc); > > /* opt_noirqbalance: If true, software IRQ balancing/affinity is disabled. > */ > bool __read_mostly opt_noirqbalance; > @@ -120,13 +121,12 @@ static void trace_irq_mask(uint32_t even > trace_var(event, 1, sizeof(d), &d); > } > > -static int __init __bind_irq_vector(int irq, int vector, const cpumask_t > *cpu_mask) > +static int __init _bind_irq_vector(struct irq_desc *desc, int vector, > + const cpumask_t *cpu_mask) > { > cpumask_t online_mask; > int cpu; > - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); > > - BUG_ON((unsigned)irq >= nr_irqs); > BUG_ON((unsigned)vector >= NR_VECTORS); > > cpumask_and(&online_mask, cpu_mask, &cpu_online_map); > @@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ static int __init __bind_irq_vector(int > return 0; > if ( desc->arch.vector != IRQ_VECTOR_UNASSIGNED ) > return -EBUSY; > - trace_irq_mask(TRC_HW_IRQ_BIND_VECTOR, irq, vector, &online_mask); > + trace_irq_mask(TRC_HW_IRQ_BIND_VECTOR, desc->irq, vector, &online_mask); > for_each_cpu(cpu, &online_mask) > - per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = irq; > + per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = desc->irq; > desc->arch.vector = vector; > cpumask_copy(desc->arch.cpu_mask, &online_mask); > if ( desc->arch.used_vectors ) > @@ -153,12 +153,18 @@ static int __init __bind_irq_vector(int > > int __init bind_irq_vector(int irq, int vector, const cpumask_t *cpu_mask) > { > + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); > unsigned long flags; > int ret; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); > - ret = __bind_irq_vector(irq, vector, cpu_mask); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); > + BUG_ON((unsigned)irq >= nr_irqs); > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); > + spin_lock(&vector_lock); > + ret = _bind_irq_vector(desc, vector, cpu_mask); > + spin_unlock(&vector_lock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > + > return ret; > } > > @@ -243,7 +249,9 @@ void destroy_irq(unsigned int irq) > > spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); > desc->handler = &no_irq_type; > - clear_irq_vector(irq); > + spin_lock(&vector_lock); > + _clear_irq_vector(desc); > + spin_unlock(&vector_lock); > desc->arch.used_vectors = NULL; > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > > @@ -266,11 +274,11 @@ static void release_old_vec(struct irq_d > } > } > > -static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq) > +static void _clear_irq_vector(struct irq_desc *desc) > { > - int cpu, vector, old_vector; > + unsigned int cpu; > + int vector, old_vector, irq = desc->irq; > cpumask_t tmp_mask; > - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); > > BUG_ON(!desc->arch.vector); > > @@ -316,11 +324,14 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq) > > void clear_irq_vector(int irq) > { > + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); > unsigned long flags; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); > - __clear_irq_vector(irq); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); > + spin_lock(&vector_lock); > + _clear_irq_vector(desc); > + spin_unlock(&vector_lock); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > } > > int irq_to_vector(int irq) > @@ -455,8 +466,7 @@ static vmask_t *irq_get_used_vector_mask > return ret; > } > > -static int __assign_irq_vector( > - int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask) > +static int _assign_irq_vector(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask) > { > /* > * NOTE! The local APIC isn't very good at handling > @@ -470,7 +480,8 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector( > * 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;) > */ > static int current_vector = FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR, current_offset = 0; > - int cpu, err, old_vector; > + unsigned int cpu; > + int err, old_vector, irq = desc->irq; > vmask_t *irq_used_vectors = NULL; > > old_vector = irq_to_vector(irq); > @@ -583,8 +594,12 @@ int assign_irq_vector(int irq, const cpu > > BUG_ON(irq >= nr_irqs || irq <0); > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); > - ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, desc, mask ?: TARGET_CPUS); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); > + > + spin_lock(&vector_lock); > + ret = _assign_irq_vector(desc, mask ?: TARGET_CPUS); > + spin_unlock(&vector_lock); > + > if ( !ret ) > { > ret = desc->arch.vector; > @@ -593,7 +608,8 @@ int assign_irq_vector(int irq, const cpu > else > cpumask_setall(desc->affinity); > } > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > > return ret; > } > @@ -767,7 +783,6 @@ void irq_complete_move(struct irq_desc * > > unsigned int set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t > *mask) > { > - unsigned int irq; > int ret; > unsigned long flags; > cpumask_t dest_mask; > @@ -775,10 +790,8 @@ unsigned int set_desc_affinity(struct ir > if (!cpumask_intersects(mask, &cpu_online_map)) > return BAD_APICID; > > - irq = desc->irq; > - > spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); > - ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, desc, mask); > + ret = _assign_irq_vector(desc, mask); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); > > if (ret < 0) > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > @@ -2134,11 +2134,16 @@ static void adjust_irq_affinity(struct a > unsigned int node = rhsa ? pxm_to_node(rhsa->proximity_domain) > : NUMA_NO_NODE; > const cpumask_t *cpumask = &cpu_online_map; > + struct irq_desc *desc; > > if ( node < MAX_NUMNODES && node_online(node) && > cpumask_intersects(&node_to_cpumask(node), cpumask) ) > cpumask = &node_to_cpumask(node); > - dma_msi_set_affinity(irq_to_desc(drhd->iommu->msi.irq), cpumask); > + > + desc = irq_to_desc(drhd->iommu->msi.irq); > + spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock); > + dma_msi_set_affinity(desc, cpumask); > + spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock); > } > > static int adjust_vtd_irq_affinities(void) > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |