[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] iommu: trivial re-organisation to avoid unnecessary test

[Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

An 'if ( !iommu_enabled )' followed by an 'if ( iommu_enabled )' with
only a printk() in between seems a little silly. Move the printk() and
use 'else' instead.

Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
index a6697d58fb..b453b32191 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
@@ -512,14 +512,14 @@ int __init iommu_setup(void)
     if ( !iommu_intremap )
         iommu_intpost = 0;
 
+    printk("I/O virtualisation %sabled\n", iommu_enabled ? "en" : "dis");
     if ( !iommu_enabled )
     {
         iommu_snoop = 0;
         iommu_hwdom_passthrough = false;
         iommu_hwdom_strict = false;
     }
-    printk("I/O virtualisation %sabled\n", iommu_enabled ? "en" : "dis");
-    if ( iommu_enabled )
+    else
     {
         printk(" - Dom0 mode: %s\n",
                iommu_hwdom_passthrough ? "Passthrough" :
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel