Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 22/05/2019 09:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 21.05.19 at 23:25, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   MAINTAINERS                   |   6 ++
> >   xen/arch/arm/Kconfig          |   7 +++
> >   xen/arch/arm/Makefile         |   1 +
> >   xen/arch/arm/domain.c         |  18 ++++++
> >   xen/arch/arm/setup.c          |   2 +
> >   xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile     |   1 +
> >   xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c        |  93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   xen/arch/arm/vsmc.c           |   5 ++
> >   xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S        |   7 +++
> >   xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h  |   1 +
> >   xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   xen/include/public/arch-arm.h |   3 +
> >   12 files changed, 253 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile
> >   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c
> >   create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h
> I don't think I'm asking this for the first time: Why am I being Cc-ed
> here? It's all Arm code that gets changed, and the MAINTAINERS
> addition alone imo doesn't warrant widening the Cc list.
A lot of users uses the scripts/{add, get}_maintainers.pl to get the list of 
maintainers to CCed. Both of them output "THE REST" because of the file 
MAINTAINERS is modified.
I don't think it is sensible to expect users to know when to strip the list...

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel