Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 22.05.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On 22/05/2019 09:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 21.05.19 at 23:25, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>   MAINTAINERS                   |   6 ++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/Kconfig          |   7 +++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/Makefile         |   1 +
>>>   xen/arch/arm/domain.c         |  18 ++++++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/setup.c          |   2 +
>>>   xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile     |   1 +
>>>   xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c        |  93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/vsmc.c           |   5 ++
>>>   xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S        |   7 +++
>>>   xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h  |   1 +
>>>   xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   xen/include/public/arch-arm.h |   3 +
>>>   12 files changed, 253 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile
>>>   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c
>>>   create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h
>> 
>> I don't think I'm asking this for the first time: Why am I being Cc-ed
>> here? It's all Arm code that gets changed, and the MAINTAINERS
>> addition alone imo doesn't warrant widening the Cc list.
> 
> A lot of users uses the scripts/{add, get}_maintainers.pl to get the list of 
> 
> maintainers to CCed. Both of them output "THE REST" because of the file 
> MAINTAINERS is modified.
> 
> I don't think it is sensible to expect users to know when to strip the 
> list...

Hmm, well, I see your point, but I think applying some common sense
still can be expected. It's also not sensible for unrelated people to
get Cc-ed. I think anyone knowing enough to modify MAINTAINERS
can be expected to know whom to Cc.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel