Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2] [DO NOT APPLY] introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall

[Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Julien,

On 28.05.19 11:59, Julien Grall wrote:
> I am not answering on the content yet, I will do that separately. The threading for this 
> series looks quite confusing. The head of the thread is this patch (i.e RFC 2) but then 
> you have a cover letter within the thread tagged "V3".
Actually I've noticed the mangled threading. But not sure why it is so. I just 
passed a folder with those patches to git-send-mail.

>  From what I understand, the 2 e-mails tagged "V3" is the original version 
> where as RFC 2 and RFC 3 are variants. Am I correct?
Yes, sure.

> If so, for next time, I would recommend to have the cover letter first and then all the 
> patches send "In-Reply-To" the cover letter. This makes easier to track series.
It might help. But before it worked well without additional tricks.


--
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel