Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2] [DO NOT APPLY] introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 28/05/2019 10:17, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
> On 28.05.19 11:59, Julien Grall wrote:
> > I am not answering on the content yet, I will do that separately. The 
> > threading for this series looks quite confusing. The head of the thread is 
> > this patch (i.e RFC 2) but then you have a cover letter within the thread 
> > tagged "V3".
> Actually I've noticed the mangled threading. But not sure why it is so. I just 
> passed a folder with those patches to git-send-mail.
IIRC, git-send-email will use the first e-mail in the alphabetical order as the 
"top e-mail" and all the other will be send "In-Reply-To".
> >  From what I understand, the 2 e-mails tagged "V3" is the original version 
> > where as RFC 2 and RFC 3 are variants. Am I correct?
> Yes, sure.
>
> > If so, for next time, I would recommend to have the cover letter first and 
> > then all the patches send "In-Reply-To" the cover letter. This makes easier to 
> > track series.
> It might help. But before it worked well without additional tricks.
In general, all the patch sent are starting with a number followed by the title. 
The number ensure the correct ordering. If you don't have number then, you will 
fallback to alphabetical order.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel