[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86emul: fix test harness and fuzzer build dependencies
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] x86emul: fix test harness and fuzzer build dependencies"): > you had been particularly unhappy about the v2 approach. While > not strictly required for committing, I'd still prefer to have > your agreement with this approach (or, of course, suggestions > for improvement). Thanks for the enquiry. I appreciate the chance to comment. I do not object to this approach. I think the extra convenience is not really worth the the complexity in the top-level Makefile but if you think it is worthwhile I won't stand in your way. I think it's important that these run targets not get entangled with the rest of the build system: ie that no non-run targets call them. If we maintain that rule then we won't introduce new build race bugs. So overall, Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |