|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH-for-4.13 v2 0/2] libxl: fix assertion failure
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:30:31PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Paul Durrant writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH-for-4.13 v2 0/2] libxl: fix
> assertion failure"):
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 17:04, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I am continuing to look at the defaulting and config management here
> > > with a view to getting rid of some of the duplicated code and moving
> > > it all into libxl.
> >
> > That would indeed be beneficial for the likes of libvirt.
>
> I propose the following plan for 4.13:
>
> * Move the default calculations of b_info->shadow_memkb and
> b_info->iommu_memkb from xl_vmcontrol.c into libxl, in a new
> function libxl__need_memory_setdefault, called from
> initiate_domain_create. That has access to the whole of c_info and
> b_info.
>
> * Change the API/ABI for libxl_domain_need_memory to take a
> libxl_domain_config. Internally, this will call an implementation
> function libxl__domain_need_memory which takes the b_info and
> c_info separately, and which calls libxl__need_memory_setdefault.
> (This is the only other call site for
> libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault.)
>
> * There will be the usual backward compatible arrangement: here, a
> function libxl_domain_need_memory_0x040c00, which will pass NULL
> for c_info. The code in libxl__need_memory_setdefault will use 0
> for the two additional memory amounts when c_info is NULL.
>
> * The overall effect is that old callers will get the old behaviour.
> New callers get the new right behaviour. This is the same as the
> present libxl 4.13 code. Note that libxl_domain_need_memory
> already has an API stability caveat.
>
> * Consequently, the need for libxl_get_required_shadow_memory and
> libxl_get_required_iommu_memory goes away. Delete them (they have
> not been in any release so we can just do this).
libxl_get_required_shadow_memory is old, and libvirt is using.
Only libxl_get_required_iommu_memory is new.
> * Invent a new value for c_info->passthrough "enabled". Defaulting
> will be 1. turn "unknown" into "disabled" or "enabled" according to
> the current logic based on pcidevs/dtdefs; 2. turn "enabled" into
> something specific according to the current logic based on type,
> hap_pt_share, etc. Make sure this is all correct inside libxl.
>
> * Delete the defaulting code in xl. xl can just leave settings not
> specified by the user as blank, and libxl will DTRT with them.
>
> What do people think ? I really want to fix this for 4.13 because the
> current 4.13 API is not one I want to support.
That plan sound fine to me.
--
Anthony PERARD
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |