[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 4/7] arm/gic: Drop pointless assertions



On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> From: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Also armclang complains about the condition always true,
> because `sgi` is of type enum with all its values under 16.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@xxxxxxxx>

Although I am not completely opposed to this, given the choice I would
prefer to keep the ASSERTs.

Given that I would imagine that the ARM C Compiler will also complain
about many other ASSERTs, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just
disable *all* ASSERTs when building with armcc by changing the
implementation of the ASSERT MACRO.


> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index 113655a..58c6141 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -294,8 +294,6 @@ void __init gic_init(void)
>  
>  void send_SGI_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask, enum gic_sgi sgi)
>  {
> -    ASSERT(sgi < 16); /* There are only 16 SGIs */
> -
>      gic_hw_ops->send_SGI(sgi, SGI_TARGET_LIST, cpumask);
>  }
>  
> @@ -306,15 +304,11 @@ void send_SGI_one(unsigned int cpu, enum gic_sgi sgi)
>  
>  void send_SGI_self(enum gic_sgi sgi)
>  {
> -    ASSERT(sgi < 16); /* There are only 16 SGIs */
> -
>      gic_hw_ops->send_SGI(sgi, SGI_TARGET_SELF, NULL);
>  }
>  
>  void send_SGI_allbutself(enum gic_sgi sgi)
>  {
> -   ASSERT(sgi < 16); /* There are only 16 SGIs */
> -
>     gic_hw_ops->send_SGI(sgi, SGI_TARGET_OTHERS, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.